Machine Learning approach for Galaxy Morphology

By -
Machine Learning approach for Galaxy Morphology


What is Gaxaly Morphology?


Galaxy morphology refers to the study and classification of the shapes, structures, and visual appearances of galaxies. It is a fundamental aspect of observational astronomy, as it provides valuable insights into the formation, evolution, and dynamics of galaxies.

The study of galaxy morphology dates back to the pioneering work of astronomers like Edwin Hubble, who developed the Hubble morphological classification system in the 1920s. Hubble's classification scheme, known as the Hubble sequence or tuning fork diagram, categorized galaxies into different types based on their visual characteristics. This system remains widely used today as a basic framework for galaxy classification.

Galaxies exhibit a remarkable diversity of morphologies, ranging from smooth and featureless elliptical galaxies to majestic spiral galaxies with well-defined arms, to irregular galaxies lacking a distinct structure. Some of the common morphological features observed in galaxies include:
  1. Elliptical Galaxies: Elliptical galaxies have a rounded, ellipsoidal shape and lack prominent spiral arms or disks. They are often characterized by their smooth appearance and can vary in size from small to giant ellipticals.
  2. Spiral Galaxies: Spiral galaxies are characterized by their flattened disk structure and prominent spiral arms. They typically possess a central bulge and a rotating disk with spiral arms that may be tightly or loosely wound.
  3. Barred Spiral Galaxies: Barred spiral galaxies have a central bar-shaped structure that extends through their bulge. The spiral arms branch out from the ends of the bar, giving them a distinct appearance.
  4. Irregular Galaxies: Irregular galaxies do not fit neatly into the elliptical or spiral categories and lack any specific symmetry or well-defined structure. They can exhibit irregular shapes, clumps, and patches of star-forming regions.

Introduction

In recent years, advancements in computational tools and algorithms have facilitated the automated analysis of galaxy morphology. There are two main approaches to automatic galaxy classification: model-driven methods and data-driven methods.

Model-driven methods, such as GALFIT, GIM2D, CAS, Gini, Ganalyzer, and SpArcFiRe, rely on mathematical models and predefined features to classify galaxies. These methods utilize parameters derived from the models or specific measurements to determine the morphology of galaxies.

On the other hand, data-driven methods employ machine learning techniques to classify galaxies based on training data. Binary classifiers can distinguish between broad morphological types, such as elliptical and spiral galaxies. Other classifiers can differentiate between four basic object types or classify galaxies according to the Hubble morphological types of E (Elliptical), S0 (Lenticular), Sab (Barred Spiral), and Scd (Late-Type Spiral). Comprehensive analysis of galaxy images can also be performed to identify specific morphological features.

In addition to image-based classification, galaxy classification can also be carried out using spectral data. Supervised and unsupervised methods can be employed to classify galaxies based on their spectra.

These automatic galaxy classification methods have the potential to improve the efficiency and accuracy of analyzing large datasets of galaxies. By utilizing computational tools and machine learning algorithms, researchers can gain insights into the formation and evolution of galaxies on a larger scale.

While supervised machine learning techniques have shown promise in classifying galaxies into discrete morphological types, they often fail to capture the continuous nature of galaxy morphology. As a result, manual observation and classification schemes, such as the Hubble sequence, remain the primary means of categorizing galaxies.

Implementing Data-Driven Methods

Data-driven methods for galaxy morphology in deep learning involve using large datasets of galaxy images to train deep neural networks to automatically classify and analyze galaxy morphology. These methods leverage the power of deep learning algorithms to extract complex features and patterns from the images, enabling the automated identification and categorization of galaxies based on their visual appearance.

One common approach in data-driven galaxy morphology is to use convolutional neural networks (CNNs), which are well-suited for image analysis tasks. CNNs consist of multiple layers of interconnected neurons that perform local receptive field operations, allowing them to capture spatial dependencies and hierarchical features present in the galaxy images.

The process typically involves the following steps:
  1. Dataset Preparation: A large dataset of labeled galaxy images is collected and annotated with their corresponding morphological types. The images may be obtained from astronomical surveys or observations.
  2. Data Preprocessing: The galaxy images are preprocessed to normalize the data and enhance the features of interest. This may include resizing, cropping, normalization, and augmentation techniques to increase the diversity of the dataset.
  3. Network Architecture Design: A CNN architecture is designed, typically consisting of multiple convolutional layers for feature extraction, followed by fully connected layers for classification. The architecture may vary depending on the specific task and the complexity of the galaxy morphology being analyzed.
  4. Training: The CNN is trained on the labeled galaxy image dataset using a supervised learning approach. During training, the network learns to map the input galaxy images to their corresponding morphological types by optimizing a defined loss function through gradient descent-based optimization algorithms.
  5. Validation and Fine-tuning: The trained network is validated on a separate validation dataset to assess its performance and make necessary adjustments. Fine-tuning techniques, such as adjusting hyperparameters or modifying the network architecture, may be applied to improve performance.
  6. Testing and Evaluation: The trained network is tested on a separate test dataset to evaluate its generalization ability and accuracy in classifying unseen galaxy images. Various evaluation metrics, such as accuracy, precision, recall, or F1 score, can be used to assess the performance of the model.
Data-driven methods for galaxy morphology in deep learning have shown promising results in automating the classification and analysis of galaxies. They can handle large-scale datasets, capture intricate patterns, and potentially uncover new insights into galaxy evolution and formation processes. However, it's important to note that the quality and diversity of the training dataset, as well as the choice of network architecture and hyperparameters, play crucial roles in the success and generalizability of these methods.

Comments

Post a Comment

Please do not use foul language while commenting. We will appreciate your suggestions and reviews in the comments.

Read Also

Assisting Neuroimaging through DL

By -
Image
Introduction: In recent years, neuroimaging has been a research attraction, especially due to fMRI (Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging) advancements. The fMRI data comprises of often several individuals. This data is used by researchers to study the association between the cognitive states of an individual and the underlying brain activities. The fMRI data used for neuroimaging is ideally suited for deep learning applications. The large, structured datasets of fMRI can be used for representation-learning methods of the DL. Generally, DL can be defined as a learning method with multiple levels of abstraction, where at each level the input data is transformed by a simple non-linear function which enables the model to recognize complex patterns. With higher-level representation, DL methods can associate a target variable with variable patterns in input data. Also, DL techniques can independently acquire these transformations from the data, eliminating the need for a comprehensive preex
Read more

Marine eDNA Analysis using DL techniques

By -
Image
Introduction Environmental DNA (eDNA) is the genetic information or material released by an organism into its surroundings through activities like skin shedding, mucus, urine or other secretions. These materials contain DNA fragments that can be found in soil, water or air samples. The concept of eDNA is based on the fact that organisms constantly leave organic traces behind them. By analysing the eDNA, researchers can detect the presence of any species in that area. This method is a valuable technique for biodiversity monitoring and ecological research.    Unlike traditional methods that involve direct observation or capturing of organisms, eDNA analysis allows researchers to study biodiversity without directly interacting with the species. This non-invasive approach is particularly useful for studying elusive or endangered species. eDNA analysis has been applied in various ecosystems, including freshwater, marine, and terrestrial environments. It is used to study aquatic organisms, t
Read more

Deep Neural Networks for ADMET properties' prediction

By -
Image
Introduction The absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity properties of any compound contributes to its potential as an orally administered drug. A set of criteria defined by Rule of Five or the Pfizer's Rule of Five stats that any compound meeting these criteria are more likely to have ADMET properties. The importance of these properties has increased in modern medicinal chemistry and new machine learning techniques are employed to predict these properties. The predictive ADMET models have helped in discovery of small molecules with improved safety and dose. Deep Neural Networks are showing usefulness in such predictions due to improved computational efficiency, larger datasets and adaption of image processing in the chemistry. Early Models The early DNNs employed showed improved prediction performance. Many researchers raised concerned that this improvement is in fact has no relation with better computational capacity, rather it is result of mere memorizing of
Read more

How Visual Cortex inspired the Convolutional Neural Networks

By -
Image
Introduction Since the 1960s, after the successful development (at least with respect to the existing technologies of that time) of the first perceptron by Frank Rosenblatt, researchers around the world have been trying to make computers more brain-like. In other words, they are constantly trying to develop programs and hardware that work much like our brains. However, creating a machine that thinks and programs like a human brain is still impossible, given the limitations of present technologies. But, we are successful in this direction up to an agreeable extent. The perceptron developed by Rosenblatt can be considered one of the first implementations of neural networks. It was a huge hardware model, rather than a Python program like today's perceptrons.  Rosenblatt's perceptron was a simple binary input-output system, with various limitations. It was not trainable for different patterns, rather but for simple image recognization. The major drawback was its inability to perfor
Read more